Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vandervorst, M.
Right arrow Articles by Liebaers, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vandervorst, M.
Right arrow Articles by Liebaers, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction Update, Vol.6, No.4 pp.364-373, 2000
© European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2000; all rights reserved

The Brussels' experience of more than 5 years of clinical preimplantation genetic diagnosis

M. Vandervorst1, C. Staessen1, K. Sermon2, A. De Vos1, H. Van de Velde1, E. Van Assche2, M. Bonduelle2, A. Vanderfaellie2, W. Lissens2, H. Tournaye1, P. Devroey1, A. Van Steirteghem1 and I. Liebaers2

1 Centre for Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital and Medical School of the Dutch Speaking Brussels Free University (Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium 2 Centre for Medical Genetics, University Hospital and Medical School of the Dutch Speaking Brussels Free University (Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium

To whom correspondence should be addressed at: M. Vandervorst, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Academisch Ziekenhuis VUB, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium. Phone: +32 2 477 6614; Fax: +32 2 477 6333; e-mail: mvandervorst{at}hotmail.com

Abstract

This paper describes the 5 years' experience of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) at the Brussels Free University. Our first PGD was carried out in February 1993. Up to October 1998, we carried out 183 PGD cycles on fresh cleavage embryos of 92 couples for 25 different conditions. Patients were treated for autosomal recessive (n = 39), autosomal dominant (n = 65) and X-linked recessive (n = 47) monogenic disorders as well as for autosomal structural aberrations (n =10), sex chromosome numerical and structural aberrations (n = 21) and a combination of the two latter (n = 1). Specific diagnosis was carried out by polymerase chain reaction (n = 108). Fluorescence in-situ hybridization was used for sexing (n = 64) and structural aberrations (n = 11). We transferred 1.6 ± 1.1 embryos per cycle, resulting in an implantation rate of 12.0% per replaced embryo. Ongoing pregnancies were achieved in 29 cycles, i.e. 23 singletons, five twins and one dichorionic triplet with an acardius acranius. The ongoing pregnancy rates per cycle, per transfer and per couple were 16.4, 19.9 and 31.5% respectively. While 28 ongoing pregnancies resulted in the births of 34 infants, one pregnancy was terminated after misdiagnosis. The results of 24 PGD were confirmed by prenatal diagnosis or after birth while no information was available in four pregnancies. Our series demonstrates that PGD is a feasible technique by which to avoid the birth of genetically affected children to couples at risk.

Key words: embryo biopsy / ICSI / preimplantation genetic diagnosis / pregnancy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
W. Verpoest, M. De Rademaeker, K. Sermon, M. De Rycke, S. Seneca, E. Papanikolaou, C. Spits, L. Van Landuyt, J. Van der Elst, P. Haentjens, et al.
Real and expected delivery rates of patients with myotonic dystrophy undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection and preimplantation genetic diagnosis
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 1654 - 1660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
V. Goossens, M. De Rycke, A. De Vos, C. Staessen, A. Michiels, W. Verpoest, A. Van Steirteghem, C. Bertrand, I. Liebaers, P. Devroey, et al.
Diagnostic efficiency, embryonic development and clinical outcome after the biopsy of one or two blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 481 - 492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Donoso, W. Verpoest, E.G. Papanikolaou, I. Liebaers, H.M. Fatemi, K. Sermon, C. Staessen, J. Van der Elst, and P. Devroey
Single embryo transfer in preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles for women <36 years does not reduce delivery rate
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1021 - 1025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Mertes, G. Pennings, and A. Van Steirteghem
An ethical analysis of alternative methods to obtain pluripotent stem cells without destroying embryos
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2749 - 2755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Fiorentino, A. Biricik, A. Nuccitelli, R. De Palma, S. Kahraman, M. Iacobelli, V. Trengia, D. Caserta, M.A. Bonu, A. Borini, et al.
Strategies and clinical outcome of 250 cycles of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for single gene disorders
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 21(3): 670 - 684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Boggio
Italy enacts new law on medically assisted reproduction
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 1153 - 1157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Pennings
Legal harmonization and reproductive tourism in Europe
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2689 - 2694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
F. J. Los, D. Van Opstal, and C. van den Berg
The development of cytogenetically normal, abnormal and mosaic embryos: a theoretical model
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2004; 10(1): 79 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
N. L. Dean, B. J. Battersby, A. Ao, R. G. Gosden, S. L. Tan, and E. A. Shoubridge
Prospect of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for heritable mitochondrial DNA diseases
Mol. Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2003; 9(10): 631 - 638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Joris, A. De Vos, R. Janssens, P. Devroey, I. Liebaers, and A. Van Steirteghem
Comparison of the results of human embryo biopsy and outcome of PGD after zona drilling using acid Tyrode medium or a laser
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1896 - 1902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Rubio, C. Simon, F. Vidal, L. Rodrigo, T. Pehlivan, J. Remohi, and A. Pellicer
Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2003; 18(1): 182 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Platteau, K. Sermon, S. Seneca, A. Van Steirteghem, P. Devroey, and I. Liebaers
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for fragile Xa syndrome: difficult but not impossible
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2002; 17(11): 2807 - 2812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
E Kanavakis and J Traeger-Synodinos
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in clinical practice
J. Med. Genet., January 1, 2002; 39(1): 6 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.